AI Agents in Finance: From Hype to Reality
Tahera Zamanzada is an award-winning executive and thought leader in digital transformation, recognized for bridging the worlds of strategy, ethics, and innovation. Her work explores how technology can expand human potential while preserving empathy, trust, and purpose in a rapidly evolving digital economy. A frequent speaker at global forums and a respected voice in the AI community, she brings a human-centered lens to the future of intelligent systems and their impact on industry and society.
 
An examination of what's actually working in production versus what remains experimental.
The promise of AI agents in finance has captured Wall Street's imagination and its checkbooks. JPMorgan now spends about $2 billion a year on artificial intelligence and has achieved roughly
the same amount in annual savings1, with CEO Jamie Dimon calling the technology's impact potentially as important as the printing press or the internet.
But beyond the breathless headlines and venture capital frenzy, what's actually working?
The reality is nuanced. While JPMorgan has rolled out its AI assistant LLM Suite to more than 60,000 employees2, and Klarna's AI assistant has had 2.3 million conversations, handling two-
thirds of customer service chats in its first month3 , we're also seeing companies pull back. Klarna itself recently resumed hiring human agents after initially claiming AI could replace 700 full-
time workers, acknowledging that while AI excelled at efficiency, it struggled with quality and empathy.
This gap between promise and practice reveals a critical truth: AI agents in finance exist on a spectrum from proven workhorses to experimental moonshots. Understanding where we are on
this spectrum and where we're heading is essential for anyone navigating the future of financial services.
Not all AI in finance qualifies as an "agent." The distinction matters because true AI agents represent a fundamental shift in how financial services operate.
The Autonomy Spectrum
Traditional automation follows predetermined rules: if X happens, do Y AI agents, by contrast, can interpret context, make decisions, and take actions with varying degrees of independence.
Think of it as the difference between a calculator and a financial advisor one executes formulas, the other makes judgment calls.
In finance, this spectrum ranges from:
- Rule-based automation: Simple if-then logic for routine tasks
- Assisted intelligence: AI that enhances human decision-making
- Augmented intelligence: AI that works alongside humans as a partner
- Autonomous agents: AI that independently executes complex, multi-step tasks
JPMorgan is now early in deploying agentic AI to handle complex multistep tasks for employees4 , with plans for every employee to have their own AI assistant, every process to be
powered by AI agents, and every client experience to have an AI concierge.
What's Actually Working (Reality)
The success stories in AI agents for finance share common characteristics: they operate in well-defined domains with clear rules, abundant data, and measurable outcomes.
Customer Service Triage and Support
Klarna's AI assistant resolves customer errands in less than 2 minutes compared to 11 minutes previously, is available in 23 markets 24/7, and communicates in more than 35 languages5. This
isn't theoretical, it's handling millions of real customer interactions monthly. However, the story isn't purely triumphant. While the AI chatbot still handles two-thirds of all customer inquiries with an 82% improvement in response times and a 25% drop in repeat issues6, Klarna acknowledged it had "gone too far" with automation and is now hiring human agents for complex, empathetic interactions.
Document Processing and Analysis
JPMorgan uses AI to create marketing content for social media channels, map out itineraries for travel clients, and summarize meetings for financial advisors7. In the global payments business,
which moves more than $8 trillion daily, AI helps prevent hundreds of millions of dollars in fraud8.
The key here is that these agents work within bounded contexts—processing loan applications, extracting data from financial statements, or verifying KYC documents. They excel at pattern
recognition and data extraction where the rules are clear and errors are catchable.
Basic Portfolio Management and Robo-Advisors
The robo-advisor market has matured significantly, with platforms like Wealthfront and Betterment managing tens of billions in assets. While robo advisors may not have disrupted
traditional advice at the scale they had hoped, they have provided millions of investors with a quality, low-cost solution for professionally managed accounts9. 
These aren't truly autonomous agents making creative investment decisions, they're sophisticated rebalancing engines following predetermined asset allocation models. Robo-advisors use algorithms and software to automatically allocate and manage client investments in portfolios of exchange-traded funds (ETFs), providing automated rebalancing and tax-loss harvesting.
Code Generation and Internal Tools
90% of Klarna's employees are using generative AI tools powered by OpenAI daily, with Communications, Marketing, and Legal teams seeing adoption rates of 93%, 88%, and 86% respectively10. These tools are particularly effective for internal productivity: generating code, drafting documents, and automating routine workflows.
What's Still Experimental (Hype)
Fully Autonomous Trading Agents.
While projects like the open-source AI Hedge Fund on GitHub demonstrate fascinating proof-of-concepts with multiple AI agents working as market data analysts, technical analysts, risk
managers, and portfolio managers11 these still remain educational tools rather than production systems at the moment. 
Financial services firms and hedge funds have long used automated trading systems, but trading systems that incorporate neural networks and make fully autonomous buy and sell decisions
remain experimental12. The Senate report on hedge fund AI use notes concerns about the rapid deployment of sophisticated AI systems without adequate oversight.
Complex Financial Planning and Advisory
JPMorgan applied to trademark IndexGPT, an AI program to select financial securities, which could be the first GPT-like product released directly to customers by a financial incumbent13.
However, this remains in development rather than production. 
The challenge is that comprehensive financial planning requires understanding personal circumstances, goals, and emotions - areas where AI still struggles. Many investors are now
starting financial advice relationships much earlier in the client lifecycle at much lower wealth levels, but they still want human advisors for complex decisions.
Regulatory Compliance Decision-Making
While AI can flag potential compliance issues, making nuanced regulatory judgments remains firmly in the experimental category. JPMorgan is being more cautious with generative AI that
directly touches the individual customer because of the risk that a chatbot gives bad information. 
Cross-System Orchestration Agents
The vision of AI agents seamlessly coordinating across multiple financial systems, departments, and external partners remains largely aspirational. While companies are building the
infrastructure for example, JPMorgan's $2 billion AI budget is part of an overall technology spend exceeding $15 billion in 2024 the full realization is years away.
So What?
The challenge ahead isn’t simply deploying smarter algorithms, it’s governing synthetic decision-makers responsibly. AI agents in finance will need ethical guardrails, auditable logic,
and shared accountability frameworks that evolve as quickly as the technology itself. The future of financial AI won’t be about how autonomous our systems become, but how accountable we
remain.
For firms navigating this transition, the distinction between proven workhorses and experimental moonshots demands a bifurcated strategy:
- Prioritize Bounded Automation: Invest heavily in agentic AI for tasks within well- defined, data-rich domains, such as document analysis, fraud prevention, and basic
 customer service triage. The immediate ROI is clear, as shown by Klarna's efficiency gains and JPMorgan's use in document processing.
- Maintain the Human-in-the-Loop: For areas requiring nuanced judgment, complex financial planning, or empathy (like complex customer complaints or regulatory
 decision-making), AI should remain in the assisted or augmented intelligence categories. Klarna's need to re-hire human agents serves as a critical lesson that prioritizing quality and empathy must take precedence over pure automation.
----
1 AIM Media House
2 CNBC
3 Klarna
4 CNBC
5 PR Newswire
6 CX Dive
7 CNBC
8 CNBC
9 Condor Capital
10 OpenAI
11 Medium
12 Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs
13 CNBC
All opinions expressed by the writers are solely their current opinions and do not reflect the views of FinancialColumnist.com, TET Events.
